COLD Q2 2025: Trims H2 Revenue Outlook After Flat Occupancy
- Stable Revenue Base from Fixed Commitments and Low Churn: The company continues to maintain fixed commitment levels at 60%, supported by well-structured, multi‐year contracts and low churn rates (under 4%), which together provide revenue stability despite pricing pressures.
- Efficient and Under-Budget Project Execution: Recent development projects, such as the Allentown expansion and the Kansas City facility, were completed under budget and ahead of typical stabilization timelines, reinforcing disciplined capital deployment and cost control.
- Global Diversification and Growth Opportunities: The business is leveraging its global presence—especially in markets like Asia Pacific where occupancy exceeds 90%—to offset muted demand in the U.S., thereby positioning itself for attractive growth in lower-risk international markets.
- Pricing Pressure: Management acknowledged that the storage market remains very competitive with "irrational" pricing moves by competitors, which could continue to pressure margins and revenue growth.
- Weak Demand & Lack of Seasonality: The executives removed the traditional seasonal occupancy uplift from their guidance due to an absence of seasonal improvements in recent quarters, citing multiple macro headwinds—such as interest rates, tariffs, inflation, and excess capacity—that are collectively suppressing demand.
- Customer Self-Sufficiency: Several large customers are increasingly using their own cold storage capacity rather than relying on third-party providers, a shift that could constrain Americold’s growth prospects in its core business.
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFFO per share | FY 2025 | $1.42 to $1.52 per share | $1.39 to $1.45 per share | lowered |
Economic Occupancy | FY 2025 | negative 200 bps to flat | decrease by 250 to 450 basis points | lowered |
Throughput | FY 2025 | –1% to +1% | decrease by 1% to 4% | lowered |
Service Margin | FY 2025 | in excess of 12% | in excess of 12% | no change |
Maintenance CapEx | FY 2025 | $80 million to $85 million | Lowered in line with the slowdown in throughput | lowered |
Sequential Throughput | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | expected slight lift from Q2 to Q3 that builds occupancy in Q4 | no prior guidance |
Occupancy Expectations | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Eliminated previously forecasted 200 basis points sequential improvement | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Fixed Commitment Contracts and Low Churn | Discussed consistently in Q1 2025 with emphasis on reaching 60% fixed commitments and low churn (<4%) ; in Q4 2024 with 59–60% fixed commitments and 3% churn ; in Q3 2024 with approximately 58% fixed commitments and 3% churn. | In Q2 2025, the company reiterated a stable revenue base with 60% fixed commitments and churn below 4%. | Consistent performance with slight improvement in fixed commitments and continued low churn across all periods. |
Robust Pipeline and Development Execution | Q1 2025 highlighted active expansion projects, a $1B pipeline, and disciplined execution. Q4 2024 emphasized a robust pipeline exceeding $1B with high-quality, low-risk developments. Q3 2024 detailed a strong $1B+ pipeline and acceleration of development starts. | Q2 2025 showcased a healthy $1B pipeline with key project launches and cost efficiencies (e.g., Allentown, Kansas City, Lancaster adjustments). | Steady and robust pipeline over periods with continued disciplined execution and slight enhancements in cost management and project turnaround. |
Pricing Dynamics: Sustained Pricing Power vs Competitive Pressure | Q1 2025 emphasized value-based pricing, annual rate increases and protections via fixed contracts. Q4 2024 noted improvements in same-store revenue and activity-based pricing, even as gains moderated. Q3 2024 reiterated pricing confidence with GRIs and balanced competitive pressures. | In Q2 2025, the focus was on competitive pressures—highlighting market pricing challenges—while underscoring the benefits of fixed commitment contracts in maintaining pricing power. | Overall sustained pricing power persists, though Q2 2025 places increased emphasis on competitive pressures and market challenges. |
Weak Demand Trends and Occupancy Challenges | Q1 2025 described declines in economic occupancy due to tariffs and reduced consumer confidence. Q4 2024 discussed flat economic occupancy and a narrow seasonal range with low inventory builds. Q3 2024 attributed occupancy declines to broad-based weak consumer demand and tough year‐over‐year comparisons. | Q2 2025 highlighted multiple headwinds (interest rates, tariffs, inflation, excess capacity) causing flat occupancy and removal of traditional seasonal uplift. | Persistent weak demand and occupancy challenges remain, with Q2 2025 adopting a more cautious, flat-outlook approach compared to earlier expectations of seasonal rebounds. |
Operational Efficiency and Margin Expansion Initiatives | Q1 2025 focused on improved labor metrics, Project Orion benefits, and margin gains (e.g., 11.2% warehouse services margins). Q4 2024 detailed productivity gains from technology investments and margin expansion (13% warehouse margins, improved AFFO). Q3 2024 emphasized productivity via Project Orion and workforce improvements driving double-digit margins. | Q2 2025 emphasized labor efficiency improvements (perm-to-temp ratios), cost management actions (portfolio rationalization with facility exits), and continued margin expansion (90 bps margin improvement). | Consistent focus on operational efficiency and margin expansion across periods, with ongoing cost management and productivity improvements reinforcing profitability. |
Global Diversification and International Market Growth | Q1 2025 referenced international development projects (Canada’s Port St. John, New Zealand expansion). Q3 2024 highlighted international projects in Dubai and planned ERP rollout in Europe. Q4 2024 did not specifically address this topic. | Q2 2025 stressed opportunities in international markets with strong European wins and highlighted resilience in global markets amid U.S. headwinds. | Global diversification remains a key focus with strengthened emphasis on European market wins and strategic international projects in Q2 2025. |
Technology and Productivity Enhancements (ERP, AI Initiatives) | Q1 2025 focused on the rollout of Project Orion in North America and APAC, with planned expansion into Europe, plus mention of incremental licensing costs. Q4 2024 detailed Project Orion’s impact along with Oracle SaaS investments. Q3 2024 provided an in‐depth discussion of ERP (Project Orion) and embedded AI initiatives. | Q2 2025 did not mention technology or productivity enhancements. | This topic, previously emphasized in Q1, Q3, and Q4, is no longer mentioned in Q2 2025, indicating a potential shift in focus or messaging in the current period. |
Customer Self-Sufficiency Risks Impacting Third-Party Business | Not mentioned in Q1 2025, Q4 2024, or Q3 2024. | Q2 2025 introduced discussion on customer self-sufficiency risks, noting that large customers are leveraging their own storage capacity before turning to third-party services. | A new topic in Q2 2025, reflecting emerging concerns about customers’ increased self-sufficiency impacting third-party business volumes. |
Asset Efficiency and Acquisition Integration Risks | Q1 2025 addressed asset efficiency through the Houston acquisition and strategic exits, along with integration risk mitigation efforts (e.g., SuperFrio exit). Q3 2024 briefly touched on acquisition discipline. Q4 2024 did not mention these topics. | Q2 2025 did not mention asset efficiency or acquisition integration risks. | Previously discussed in Q1 2025, this topic is omitted in Q2 2025, suggesting a deprioritization or completion of earlier integration efforts. |
Shift Away from Traditional Seasonal Occupancy Uplift | Q1 2025 referenced more normal seasonal trends with modest sequential changes. Q4 2024 anticipated a return to traditional seasonal uplifts later in the year. Q3 2024 did not specifically address a shift. | Q2 2025 explicitly noted the removal of the traditional seasonal inventory build, projecting flat occupancy (apart from agricultural harvests) due to a lack of seasonal uptick in June/July. | A clear shift in sentiment in Q2 2025: while earlier periods expected seasonal uplifts, the current period now forecasts flat occupancy, marking a notable adjustment in expectations. |
-
Revenue Guidance
Q: What drives revenue shortfall?
A: Management explained that demand headwinds—from factors such as interest rates, tariffs, inflation and a missing seasonal inventory build—are pressuring revenue, which guided them to trim revenue expectations in the back half of the year. -
Competitive Pricing
Q: How competitive is pricing now?
A: They noted the market is very competitive, with pricing pressure and some irrational moves, but stressed their strong operational execution and low churn below 4% help defend margins. -
Occupancy Outlook
Q: What are next half’s occupancy expectations?
A: Management stated that occupancy will remain essentially flat in the second half, as seasonal lifts were not observed and forecasts have been adjusted to reflect muted improvements. -
Capital Deployment
Q: How are new developments approaching returns?
A: They are focused on low-risk, customer-driven projects targeting a return hurdle of 10–12%, with recent projects coming in below budget serving as a positive indicator. -
Fixed Commitments
Q: How do fixed commitments work?
A: Management described fixed commitment contracts as multiyear agreements with fixed monthly fees, pegging at 60% for the quarter, which provides both operational stability and clear capacity for customers. -
Demand Catalysts
Q: What could spur occupancy improvements?
A: They indicated that overcoming several headwinds simultaneously is key; only when macro issues like tariffs, inflation, and interest rates improve might customers’ inventory buildup recover. -
Customer Owned Capacity
Q: Do customers have spare storage capacity?
A: Management observed that most large customers are already operating their own networks at full capacity, meaning additional inventory would likely flow back to third-party providers like them when demand normalizes. -
Tariff Impact
Q: How have tariffs affected the business?
A: They emphasized that while direct impacts from tariffs are minimal, the indirect effects—such as reduced consumer confidence—have a more pronounced negative impact on overall demand. -
Holiday Seasonality
Q: Why no holiday occupancy lift?
A: The team noted that, despite traditional expectations around the holidays, current conditions show no seasonal uplift in occupancy, leading to a conservative forecast for a flat second half. -
Development NOI Growth
Q: What NOI benefits are expected from new projects?
A: Although new developments initially generate minimal NOI during startup, once they stabilize the incremental NOI should compound at returns consistent with their 10–12% hurdle, adding gradual value to the platform. -
Customer Integration
Q: How is tenant self-managed storage affecting demand?
A: Management acknowledged that some customers are using their own cold storage more aggressively due to current economic pressures, though this represents a minor factor that is expected to reverse once demand improves. -
Other Income Breakdown
Q: What contributed to other income?
A: They clarified that the $5.7M other income came from gains on asset sales and hedging transactions, which ultimately flowed through to AFFO without distorting overall performance.
Research analysts covering AMERICOLD REALTY TRUST.